Skip to main content

Jernigan v. State

Citations

  • 894 N.E.2d 1044
  • 2008 Ind. App. LEXIS 2231
  • 2008 WL 4572373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “courts at all levels are required to consider the issue [of subject matter jurisdiction] sua sponte”
  • noting that once an appeal is perfected, the trial court loses subject matter jurisdiction except for certain limited purposes
  • concluding sua sponte that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to rule on the motion from which the appellant appealed
  • “Subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived, and courts at all levels are required to consider the issue sua sponte.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias, Baker, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.