Skip to main content

Ousley v. State

Citations

  • 807 N.E.2d 758
  • 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 794
  • 2004 WL 937873

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the trial court may consider the nature and circumstances of a crime when sentencing a defendant
  • interpreting Post-Conviction Rule 1(10)(b) as implicitly allowing evidence of positive conduct after the original sentence
  • “mental illness is a mitigating factor to be used in certain circumstances, such as when the evidence demonstrates longstanding mental health issues or when the jury finds that a defendant is mentally ill”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Robb, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Ousley v. State

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.