Court of Appeals of Maryland· 12/19/2019
State v. Mann
Citations
- 466 Md. 473
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Generally, where a petitioner alleges ineffective assistance of counsel, the burden rests on him or her to satisfy both the performance prong and the prejudice prong.” (Cleaned up)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Watts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Weaver v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 2017-06-22· cited 717×
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-12-07· cited 94×
- Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-09-04· cited 92×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-01-10· cited 50×
- Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-08-23· cited 44×
- Gross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-10-11· cited 32×
- Yoswick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-09-17· cited 29×
- Robertson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-12-02· cited 24×
- Pulley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-02-14· cited 22×
- McMillan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-08-24· cited 22×
- Schmitt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-08-31· cited 10×
- State v. MannCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-05-01· cited 3×
- State v. MatthewsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-04-04· cited 3×
- State v. MannCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2019-07-12· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.