Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 10/28/2005
Martin v. State
Citations
- 885 A.2d 339
- 165 Md. App. 189
- 2005 Md. App. LEXIS 269
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that even failure to instruct on an offense does not constitute structural error and any error is subject to harmless error review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hollander, Sharer, Moylan, Charles
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hammersla v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-02-26· cited 24×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-05-28· cited 21×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-07-01· cited 20×
- James v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-24· cited 19×
- Alston v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-10-03· cited 19×
- Massey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-07· cited 17×
- Jones-Harris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-03-13· cited 12×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-03-30· cited 11×
- Gross v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-27· cited 10×
- Peterson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-28· cited 9×
- Steward v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-27· cited 9×
- Olson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-11-28· cited 7×
- Elliott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-06-01· cited 6×
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-27· cited 6×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-28· cited 5×
- Myers v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-11-06· cited 5×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-07· cited 4×
- Joyner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-11-29· cited 3×
Cites
70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 7,022×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 4,572×
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 3,512×
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court· 2002-05-20· cited 3,303×
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1944-03-27· cited 1,935×
- Mitchell v. EsparzaSupreme Court· 2003-11-03· cited 1,091×
- Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1978-05-30· cited 844×
- United States v. Barry J. GriffinFirst Circuit· 1987-04-23· cited 217×
- United States v. MoranFirst Circuit· 2004-12-15· cited 210×
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-07-15· cited 210×
- Evans v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-11-25· cited 201×
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-01-14· cited 158×
- Klauenberg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-25· cited 143×
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-05-17· cited 137×
- State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-02-25· cited 131×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.