Supreme Court of Florida· 7/16/1992
Robertson v. State
Citations
- 604 So. 2d 783
- 1992 WL 163957
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when State fails to comply with administrative rules and statutory provisions governing approved testing methods, test results are admissible if State lays the common law predicate
- paraphrasing an analogous Iowa case and explaining that “[t]he same is true of Florida’s implied consent law”
- test results of blood drawn for exclusively medical purposes are outside the scope of the Implied Consent Law, and may be seized and used as evidence in DUI prosecutions
- following State v. Wallin, 195 N.W.2d 95, 98 (Iowa 1972)
- “[T]he implied consent statute ... applies] only when blood is being taken from a person based on probable cause that the person has caused death or serious bodily injury as a result of a DUI offense specified in the statutes.”
- the party seeking to introduce test results must establish: (1) the test was reliable, (2) the test was performed by a qualified operator with the proper equipment, and (3) expert testimony must be presented concerning the meaning of the test
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kogan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-03-21· cited 46×
- State v. MilesSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-11-30· cited 39×
- State v. BoddenSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-04-15· cited 39×
- State v. RutherfordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-04· cited 29×
- Cardenas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-02-26· cited 26×
- State v. SlaneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-22· cited 18×
- Freddie Beckham, III v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2017-05-30· cited 17×
- State v. MilesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-27· cited 13×
- Rafferty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-01· cited 12×
- Leveritt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-07· cited 12×
- Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-15· cited 12×
- Mehl v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-09-16· cited 11×
- State v. BastosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-11· cited 11×
- State v. GeissDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-22· cited 11×
- State v. MurrayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-01-07· cited 11×
- Michie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-02· cited 10×
- Tyner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-12· cited 10×
- Cameron v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-18· cited 10×
- State v. BergerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-26· cited 10×
- State v. FriedrichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-12· cited 10×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
- State v. BenderSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-04-03· cited 104×
- State v. WallinSupreme Court of Iowa· 1972-02-25· cited 70×
- State v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-05-09· cited 24×
- State v. GillmanSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-11-06· cited 23×
- State v. WillsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-06-07· cited 22×
- State v. SheltonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1970-04-07· cited 21×
- State v. StrongSupreme Court of Florida· 1987-04-02· cited 20×
- State v. RooseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-03-13· cited 12×
- State v. QuartararoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-01-27· cited 7×
- Donaldson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-05-09· cited 7×
- Albritton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-05-10· cited 5×
- Robertson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-08· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.