Fifth Circuit· 1/24/2003
Roberts v. Cockrell
Citations
- 319 F.3d 690
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 1116
- 2003 WL 164599
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a conviction is final when the defendant does not timely proceed to the next available step in the state appeal process
- holding that a conviction is final when the defendant does not timely proceed to the next available step in the state appeal process
- holding that state prisoner’s conviction was final when the time for filing a petition for discretionary review expired
- holding that a conviction is final when the defendant does not timely proceed to the next available step in the state appeal process
- holding that, when the petitioner has halted the review process, “the conviction becomes final when the time for seeking further direct review in the state court expires.”
- holding that, when the petitioner has halted the review process, “the conviction becomes final when the time for seeking further direct review in the state court expires.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jolly, Higginbotham, Magill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hernandez v. ThalerFifth Circuit· 2011-01-06· cited 307×
- Henderson v. CockrellFifth Circuit· 2003-06-09· cited 114×
- Roland Palacios v. William Stephens, DirectorFifth Circuit· 2013-07-18· cited 73×
- Riddle v. KemnaEighth Circuit· 2008-04-08· cited 73×
- Causey v. CainFifth Circuit· 2006-05-24· cited 64×
- Butler v. CainFifth Circuit· 2008-06-25· cited 60×
- Coleman v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2006-07-18· cited 57×
- Wallace v. State of MississippiFifth Circuit· 2022-08-08· cited 57×
- Unnamed caseFifth Circuit· 2005-10-26· cited 54×
- Windland v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2009-08-10· cited 51×
- United States v. PlascenciaFifth Circuit· 2008-07-23· cited 45×
- Parr v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2006-12-07· cited 43×
- Ries v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2008-03-27· cited 38×
- Salinas v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2004-01-07· cited 34×
- Gonzalez v. ThalerFifth Circuit· 2010-10-06· cited 34×
- Paul Clarke v. Steve RaderFifth Circuit· 2013-06-25· cited 31×
- Foreman v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2004-08-27· cited 25×
- Mark v. ThalerFifth Circuit· 2011-07-06· cited 25×
- Albert L. Pierson v. Dave DormireEighth Circuit· 2007-04-04· cited 21×
- Scott v. HubertFifth Circuit· 2011-03-09· cited 14×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court· 2000-11-07· cited 1,366×
- Caspari v. BohlenSupreme Court· 1994-02-23· cited 697×
- Davis v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 1998-10-21· cited 444×
- James C. Flanagan v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionFifth Circuit· 1998-09-01· cited 344×
- Spotville v. CainFifth Circuit· 1998-08-03· cited 270×
- Lackey v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 1997-06-26· cited 211×
- Lookingbill v. CockrellFifth Circuit· 2002-06-03· cited 131×
- Kiser v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 1999-01-06· cited 123×
- Larry Wixom v. State of WashingtonNinth Circuit· 2001-09-05· cited 89×
- Emerson v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 2001-03-15· cited 75×
- Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-02-16· cited 61×
- Johnson v. CainFifth Circuit· 2000-06-20· cited 39×
- Thomas M. Giesberg v. Janie Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionFifth Circuit· 2002-04-23· cited 34×
- Floyd Calvin Roberts v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-12-23· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.