· 7/18/2006
Coleman v. Quarterman
Citations
- 456 F.3d 537
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 18056
- 2006 WL 1991686
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to consider argument which was raised for the first time in a post-judgment motion in the district court
- “It is not only permissible but proper for a trial judge to ask a jury to continue deliberating if it appears that further deliberation might be fruitful in helping the jury reach a unanimous verdict.”
- “A credibility determination by the state habeas court also is afforded deference.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garza, Demoss, Clement
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.