Parr v. Quarterman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counsel was not deficient in failing to present a meritless argument
• affirming the district court’s holding that a sufficiency argument was procedurally barred because the habeas applicant “did not present th[is] claim[] to the state court on direct appeal or in state habeas proceedings”
• failure to make frivolous objection does not constitute deficient representation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).