Larry Wixom v. State of Washington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Since April 24, 1996, state prisoner habeas petitions have been subject to 8 the statute of limitations enacted as part of the [AEDPA].”
• “Since April 24, 1996, state prisoner 17 habeas petitions have been subject to the statute of limitations enacted as part of the 18 [AEDPA].”
• “Since April 24, 1996, state prisoner 4 habeas petitions have been subject to the statute of limitations enacted as part of the 5 [AEDPA].”
• it is 3 the decision of the state appellate court, and not the ministerial act of issuing the 4 mandate, that renders review final
• “one-year limitations period ‘shall run from 9 the latest of - (A) the date on which the judgment became final by the 10 conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such 11 review.’”
• Petition for review must be filed 4 within 30 days

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).