Skip to main content

Ex Parte Johnson

Citations

  • 12 S.W.3d 472
  • 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 19
  • 2000 WL 168423

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to consider application for writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07 of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure only after final felony judgment
  • “Applicant’s claim is not ripe, because the application for writ of habeas corpus was filed during the pen-dency of the direct appeal.”
  • “Applicant’s claim is not ripe, because the application for writ of habeas corpus was filed during the pendency of the direct appeal.”
  • If an applicant appeals his conviction and sentence, his conviction is not final for purposes of Article 11.07 until the court of appeals issues its mandate
  • explaining judgment is not final before issuance of the mandate
  • “Prior to the mandate, a judgment is not final.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.