Paul Clarke v. Steve Rader

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding a notice delay of “less than a month” is not extraordinary
• stating the Court has “serious reservations” about whether a State’s failure to notify petitioner of a denial provides a basis for a statutory tolling claim rather than merely an equitable tolling claim
• stating the Court has “serious reservations” about whether a State’s failure to notify petitioner of a denial provides a basis for a statutory tolling claim rather than merely an equitable tolling claim
• petitioner did not show diligence when he waited eleven months to inquire as to the status of his writ application, when he also waited nine months to file an application for post-conviction relief and waited three months to file a federal habeas application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).