In Re Intelligroup Securities Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking judicial notice of an SEC Investigation Notice “duly filed with by Intelligroup with the SEC” among several other documents
• taking judicial notice of “stock price data compiled by a reliable financial news service.”
• denying leave to amend where plaintiffs “had three full opportunities to state a claim and failed to do so, in spite of . . . [the court] providing [p]laintiffs with a detailed roadmap in its previous opinion”
• denying leave to amend where plaintiffs “had three full opportunities to state a claim and failed to do so, in spite of . . . [the court] providing [p]laintiffs with a detailed roadmap in its previous opinion”
• Sar-banes-Oxley certifications establish scien-ter only if facts are set forth to show that defendants had actual knowledge or “turned a ‘blind eye’ ” to information showing that thé certification was erroneous
• “If the plaintiff desires to employ the “motive and opportunity” 16 method, the plaintiff should demonstrate a logical connection between the alleged fraud and motive in order to establish a reasonable inference of fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).