General Signal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that time limits were reasonable when they were based on the estimates in the parties’ joint pretrial statement
• identifying abuse of discretion review but engaging in an \independent review\ of court filings and offer of proof
• finding that citation to California law in earlier 7 motions and a delay in raising a choice of law issue before trial is not playing “fast and 8 loose“ with the court
• rejecting an argument based on waiver where the district court had not yet 28 ruled on the issue of choice of law
• denying, review of denial of summary judgment after a jury verdict for the moving party
• refusing to find a time limit to be unreasonable when the complaining party failed to show what required evidence it was prevented from presenting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).