Skip to main content

Rivera v. State

Citations

  • 561 So. 2d 536
  • 1990 WL 49776

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding proffered reverse Williams rule evidence
  • admissibility of evidence must be gauged by the same principle of relevancy as any other evidence offered by the defendant.
  • \relevant evidence should not be excluded unless no other remedy suffices.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.