Skip to main content

Richardson v. State

Citations

  • 744 S.W.2d 65
  • 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 686
  • 1987 WL 1106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that evidence offered by a defendant that is not inconsistent with or preclusive of his guilt is not probative and may be excluded
  • noting that both under Texas law and Davis v. Alaska, “the accused is given great latitude in showing any fact which would tend to establish ill feeling, bias, or motive for fabrication on the part of any witness testifying against the accused.”
  • common law attorney-client privilege did not apply to communications between inmate-defendant and his inmate \legal advisor\
  • witness list furnished pursuant to court order
  • witness list furnished pursuant to court order
  • witness list furnished pursuant to court order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton, Duncan, Teague, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

107 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.