Skip to main content

Stewart v. State

Citations

  • 686 S.W.2d 118
  • 1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 732

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendant’s claim that art. 37.071 was unconstitutional because it did not contain a special mitigation issue; stating that jurors were not precluded from considering mitigation evidence under then-existing Texas special issues
  • “Other than the provisions in Article 37.071, V.A.C.C.P., Texas jurisprudence has no authority allowing the submission of special issues to a jury in a criminal case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Teague, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

123 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.