Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 662 S.W.2d 344
  • 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging evidence of extraneous robbery bolstered circumstantial evidence of appellant being merely present during subsequent robbery of same location
  • acknowledging evidence of extraneous robbery bolstered circumstantial evidence of appellant’s being merely present during subsequent robbery of same location
  • recognizing “inherently prejudicial” nature of extraneous offense evidence
  • recognizing “inherently prejudicial” nature of extraneous offense evidence
  • “The general rule is that an accused may not be tried . . . for being a criminal generally”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Clinton, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

179 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.