Skip to main content

Reed v. State

Citations

  • 158 S.W.3d 44
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 651
  • 2005 WL 171343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence is legally sufficient in light of expert testimony that such a large amount was intended for sale
  • holding evidence is legally sufficient in light of expert testimony that liquid codeine seized from appellant was large amount typically not for personal use
  • holding evidence is legally sufficient in light of expert testimony that liquid codeine seized from appellant was large amount typically not for personal use
  • holding evidence legally sufficient in light of expert testimony liquid codeine seized from defendant was large amount typically not for personal use
  • stating that the absence of either drug use paraphernalia or drug sale paraphernalia can be considered in determining intent
  • stating that the absence of either drug use paraphernalia or drug sale paraphernalia can be considered in determining intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eva M. Guzman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.