Lundy v. Masson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that appellant failed to provide argument or cite authority for contention on appeal and stating that appellate court was “not required to do the job of the advocate”
• “Lundy cannot be held liable for failing to disclose a fact the company knew through one of its officers.”
• ‘‘[t]he elements of a breach of fiduciary duty claim are: (1) a fiduciary relationship between the plaintiff and [the] defendant, (2) a breach by the defendant of his fiduciary duty to the plaintiff, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).