Skip to main content
· 9/28/2004

Marriage of Fuentes v. Fuentes

Citations

  • 97 P.3d 876
  • 209 Ariz. 51

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that appellate court presumes trial court considered all evidence presented
  • stating this Court assumes the family court fully considered all admitted evidence
  • we will not disturb an evidentiary ruling “absent both a clear abuse of discretion and resulting prejudice.”
  • “Although the trial court’s signed minute entry does not specifically detail [Father]’s financial situation, the 6 MURPHY v. RODRIGUEZ Decision of the Court foregoing evidence is presumed to have been fully considered by the court prior to issuing its decision.”
  • we presume the court considered all the admissible evidence
  • we presume the court considered all evidence admitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberg, Snow, Gemmill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.