Skip to main content
· 4/12/2013

In Re the Marriage of Kassa

Citations

  • 231 Ariz. 592
  • 299 P.3d 1290
  • 658 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
  • 2013 WL 1502171
  • 2013 Ariz. App. LEXIS 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, absent Family Rule 78(B) certification, an appeal is premature unless the court “resolve[d] all issues raised in a post-decree petition”
  • holding that an order resolving contempt, spousal maintenance, and arrearages, but not resolving child support and attorneys’ fees, was not final and appealable absent a Rule 78(B) determination
  • holding order resolving some post-decree claims but not resolving issues of child support modification or attorneys’ fees was not final and appealable
  • noting that \we may apply interpretations of Rule 54(b) to Rule 78([b])\
  • declining to award attorneys’ fees on appeal where the requesting party did not cite statutory basis for the award
  • “Our jurisdiction is prescribed by statute, and we have no authority to entertain an appeal over which we do not have jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Eckerstrom, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.