Barassi v. Matison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the “underlying rationale of requiring a final judgment . . . is to avoid the constant disruption of the trial process, to prevent appellate courts from considering issues that may be addressed later . . . and to promote efficiency . . . .”
• \[A] premature appeal from a minute entry order in which no appellee was prejudiced and in which a subsequent final judgment was entered over which jurisdiction may be exercised need not be dismissed.\
• “The underlying rationale of requiring a final judgment for appealability is to avoid the constant disruption of the trial process . . . and to promote efficiency, that is, encourage the consolidation in one appeal of all error a litigant feels transpired during the trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).