· 7/31/1997
Sorensen v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona
Citations
- 957 P.2d 1007
- 191 Ariz. 464
- 249 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 37
- 1997 Ariz. App. LEXIS 140
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting appellate court has an independent duty to examine whether it has appellate jurisdiction over putative appeals
- declining to consider merits of appeal where parties had stipulated to final judgment in order to create an “appealable order”
- noting appellate court has an independent duty to examine whether it has appellate jurisdiction over putative appeals
- noting appellate court has an independent duty to examine whether it has appellate jurisdiction over putative appeals
- dismissing the appeal after finding the court did not have jurisdiction
- “A denial of a motion for summary judgment is an intermediate order deciding simply that the case should go to trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ehrlich, Sult, Voss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.