Skip to main content
· 7/31/1997

Sorensen v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona

Citations

  • 957 P.2d 1007
  • 191 Ariz. 464
  • 249 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 37
  • 1997 Ariz. App. LEXIS 140

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting appellate court has an independent duty to examine whether it has appellate jurisdiction over putative appeals
  • declining to consider merits of appeal where parties had stipulated to final judgment in order to create an “appealable order”
  • noting appellate court has an independent duty to examine whether it has appellate jurisdiction over putative appeals
  • noting appellate court has an independent duty to examine whether it has appellate jurisdiction over putative appeals
  • dismissing the appeal after finding the court did not have jurisdiction
  • “A denial of a motion for summary judgment is an intermediate order deciding simply that the case should go to trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ehrlich, Sult, Voss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.