Idaho Supreme Court· 4/28/2004

State v. Weber

Citations

90 P.3d 314
140 Idaho 89
2004 Ida. LEXIS 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that Weber’s plea may not have been knowingly, voluntarily, or intelligently made, but nevertheless refusing to allow a collateral attack
recognizing the importance of finality of judgments in limiting a defendant’s right to collaterally attack a criminal conviction
holding that “challenges to the validity of prior convictions alleged to have been obtained as the result of invalid guilty pleas must be raised either through a direct appeal or by post-conviction relief and not in proceedings related to a subsequent felony DUI offense”
noting that the right to collaterally attack does “not extend beyond situations where the prior convictions were obtained in violation of the right to counsel” (internal quotation marks omitted)
listing Kansas among the states that align with Custis based upon the Kansas Supreme Court decisions in Chiles and Delacruz
reviewing the trial court’s interpretation of I.C.R. 11(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Trout, Kidwell, Eismann, Burdick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.