Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 11/8/2001
Dean v. State
Citations
- 60 S.W.3d 217
- 2001 WL 930881
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that A the Act and its 1999 amendments are not excessive in relation to its stated non-punitive purposes . . . the Act is essentially regulatory. Accordingly, the Act and 1999 amendments do not violate the ex post facto clause in the United States Constitution @
- the Texas SORP is “essentially regulatory” and so not violative of ex post facto laws
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Hudson, Seymore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-09-18· cited 448×
- Pomier v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-10-21· cited 96×
- State v. CollazoTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2008-08-20· cited 91×
- Rosas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-05-09· cited 65×
- Ponce v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-10-03· cited 51×
- State v. MacNabOregon Supreme Court· 2002-08-15· cited 28×
- Rodriguez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-02-15· cited 20×
- Barker v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-02-15· cited 18×
- Coronado v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-10-05· cited 15×
- Steven McCraw v. C.I.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2017-08-03· cited 5×
- Rosas, Jose Leonardo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-05-09
- State v. Eusebio Collazo Jr.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-11-01
- Alejandro Rodriguez v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-02-15
- Roman Ponce v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-08-30
- Timothy Scott Rollings AKA Timothy Scott Rollins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-05-20
- Ex Parte Joselito MercadoTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-04-03
- Coronado, Edward Galvan v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-10-05
- Herron, Larry Leonard v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-05-27
- Mann, Michael Flavil v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-10-04
- Ramirez, Omar Felipe v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-07-21
Cites
51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court· 1963-02-18· cited 2,208×
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court· 1798-08-17· cited 1,860×
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court· 1998-09-30· cited 1,648×
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-12-10· cited 1,410×
- Tong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-09-20· cited 1,364×
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court· 1943-01-18· cited 1,062×
- United States v. WardSupreme Court· 1980-08-22· cited 969×
- Rhoades v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-10-02· cited 959×
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-07-25· cited 688×
- Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court· 2000-05-01· cited 525×
- De Veau v. BraistedSupreme Court· 1960-06-06· cited 494×
- Ex Parte GranvielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-02-01· cited 401×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1996-04-12· cited 365×
- Peeler v. Hughes & LuceTexas Supreme Court· 1995-10-27· cited 342×
- Ely v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-07-03· cited 329×
- State v. WardWashington Supreme Court· 1994-03-17· cited 303×
- Nos. 96-5132, 96-5416Third Circuit· 1997-09-04· cited 301×
- Arthur Cutshall, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Don Sundquist, Govenor of the State of Tennessee, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1999-10-04· cited 255×
- Russell v. GregoireNinth Circuit· 1997-09-04· cited 193×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.