Skip to main content

Dean v. State

Citations

  • 60 S.W.3d 217
  • 2001 WL 930881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that A the Act and its 1999 amendments are not excessive in relation to its stated non-punitive purposes . . . the Act is essentially regulatory. Accordingly, the Act and 1999 amendments do not violate the ex post facto clause in the United States Constitution @
  • the Texas SORP is “essentially regulatory” and so not violative of ex post facto laws

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Hudson, Seymore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.