Idaho Supreme Court· 2/10/2009
Smith v. State
Citations
- 203 P.3d 1221
- 146 Idaho 822
- 2009 Ida. LEXIS 31
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the duty to register as a sex offender is triggered simply by reason of conviction for a specified crime, as opposed to classification as a violent sexual predator which is based upon a factual determination of probable future conduct
- effects of state registry are not punitive and do not violate ex post facto prohibition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horton, Burdick, Jones, Eismann
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2013-06-25· cited 125×
- Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-03-17· cited 19×
- Erick Virgil Hall v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2013-12-02· cited 18×
- State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-12-08· cited 15×
- In the Matter of Jeffrey Allen ChapmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-02-15· cited 14×
- Kara Alexander v. Vianna StibalIdaho Supreme Court· 2016-02-26· cited 10×
- State v. PickensIdaho Court of Appeals· 2010-01-07· cited 7×
- Rbrt Groves v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-04-21· cited 4×
- Travis David Knox v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2017-09-29· cited 3×
- State v. OrozcoIdaho Supreme Court· 2021-03-19· cited 3×
- State v. David Leroy LeeIdaho Supreme Court· 2014-02-10· cited 1×
- In the Matter of Termination of Parental RightsIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-03-17
- Evan Edward Morgan, Jr. v. Sexual Offender Classification BoardIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-10-26
- Morgan v. Sexual Offender Classification BoardIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-10-26
- State v. CristIdaho Supreme Court· 2025-07-01
- State v. RobertsonIdaho Supreme Court· 2025-11-24
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 6,497×
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court· 1975-01-22· cited 3,014×
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 2,057×
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court· 1951-04-30· cited 1,907×
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court· 1971-01-19· cited 1,666×
- Wieman v. UpdegraffSupreme Court· 1952-12-15· cited 860×
- Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. DoeSupreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 487×
- People v. David W.New York Court of Appeals· 2000-06-15· cited 135×
- Brand S Corp. v. KingIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-12-18· cited 77×
- John Doe, I Jane Doe John Doe, II v. Bill Tandeske Gregg D. RenkesNinth Circuit· 2004-03-17· cited 71×
- Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-05-26· cited 66×
- Ada County Highway District v. Total Success Investment, LLCIdaho Supreme Court· 2008-02-19· cited 66×
- Ray v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-06-21· cited 64×
- Workman v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2007-06-27· cited 61×
- State v. BainbridgeIdaho Supreme Court· 1985-03-14· cited 57×
- Parrott v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1990-02-14· cited 54×
- H & v Engineering, Inc. v. Idaho State Board of Professional Engineers & Land SurveyorsIdaho Supreme Court· 1987-11-04· cited 50×
- State v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court· 1995-03-30· cited 48×
- Carter v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1985-06-20· cited 45×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.