Nevada Supreme Court· 4/24/1986
Roberts v. State
Citations
- 717 P.2d 1115
- 102 Nev. 170
- 1986 Nev. LEXIS 1125
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a serious and highly provoking injury need not be a direct physical assault by the victim
- a serious and highly provoking injury need not be a direct physical assault on the victim
- a defendant is entitled to jury instructions that comport with his theory of the case as disclosed by the evidence, no matter how weak or incredible that evidence may appear to be
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Peck v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 27×
- Schoels v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1998-10-27· cited 26×
- Duckett v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1988-03-30· cited 22×
- Batson v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-06-17· cited 20×
- Quillen v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-12-20· cited 20×
- Walker v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 8×
- Williams v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1994-11-30· cited 8×
- Aldana v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 4×
- COLLINS (LESEAN) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2017-11-22
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.