Nevada Supreme Court· 6/13/2001

Grant v. State

Citations

24 P.3d 761
117 Nev. 427
117 Nev. Adv. Rep. 38
2001 Nev. LEXIS 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding sufficient evidence supported the larceny element that the defendant have the \intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property\
listing the actions taken by the State to attempt to procure the witness and concluding that those actions were not diligent
\Intent need not be proven by direct evidence but can be inferred from conduct and circumstantial evidence.\
\Intent need not be proven by direct evidence but can be inferred from conduct and circumstantial evidence.\
“Intent need not be proved by direct evidence but can be inferred from conduct and 14 circumstantial evidence.”
\Intent [to permanently deprive] . . . can be inferred from conduct and circumstantial evidence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shearing, Agosti, Rose

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.