Nevada Supreme Court· 2/16/2001
Jackson v. State
Citations
- 17 P.3d 998
- 117 Nev. 116
- 117 Nev. Adv. Rep. 12
- 2001 Nev. LEXIS 12
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a change in appearance instruction was warranted when an incarcerated defendant significantly altered his hairstyle while being transported for a lineup
- holding that the district court abuses its discretion if its decision is \arbitrary or capricious or if it exceeds the bounds of law or reason\
- holding that, if a jury instruction accurately states the law, this court will not disturb the district court's discretionary decision to issue a jury instruction unless the decision is arbitrary or capricious
- providing that we review a district court's decision to give or refuse a jury instruction for an abuse of discretion or judicial error
- reviewing a district court's settling of jury instructions for an abuse of discretion or judicial error
- regarding jury instructions, \[a]ri abuse of discretion occurs if the district court's decision is arbitrary or capricious or if it exceeds the bounds of law or reason.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Young, Rose, Becker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crawford v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2005-10-20· cited 230×
- Nunnery v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2011-10-27· cited 126×
- Ringle v. BrutonNevada Supreme Court· 2004-04-01· cited 81×
- Butler v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2004-12-20· cited 66×
- Wyman v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2009-10-08· cited 47×
- Insurance Co. of the West v. Gibson Tile Co.Nevada Supreme Court· 2006-05-11· cited 38×
- Skender v. Brunsonbuilt Construction & Development Co.Nevada Supreme Court· 2006-12-28· cited 36×
- Stephans v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2011-10-06· cited 32×
- American Sterling Bank v. Johnny Management LV, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court· 2010-10-28· cited 31×
- Nolan v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-04-20· cited 20×
- State v. Eric A. L.Nevada Supreme Court· 2007-03-08· cited 19×
- Rose v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2011-07-21· cited 17×
- Atkinson v. MGM Grand Hotel, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court· 2004-10-13· cited 16×
- Morgan v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2018-05-03· cited 16×
- Nay v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2007-09-20· cited 10×
- Mathews v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2018-08-23· cited 10×
- Rainey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-08-11· cited 10×
- BARLOW (KEITH) v. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-DIRECT)Nevada Supreme Court· 2022-04-14· cited 6×
- Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Nevada· 2023-07-20· cited 4×
- PUNDYK (EDWARD) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2020-07-16· cited 3×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McNair v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1992-01-24· cited 275×
- Byford v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2000-02-28· cited 246×
- United States v. Barry Jay FeldmanNinth Circuit· 1986-05-23· cited 215×
- United States v. Ernest James PerkinsNinth Circuit· 1991-07-01· cited 137×
- Domingues v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-05-30· cited 78×
- Greene v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-01-04· cited 71×
- Lay v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1994-11-30· cited 60×
- District of Columbia v. M.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-10-29· cited 48×
- Cunningham v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1978-03-15· cited 39×
- Quillen v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-12-20· cited 20×
- United States v. Terrence McKinley A/K/A Terrance McKinley United States of America v. Raymond A. WashingtonD.C. Circuit· 1973-09-10· cited 18×
- Howard v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1986-12-15· cited 17×
- State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public Safety v. RootNevada Supreme Court· 1997-08-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.