Skip to main content

Puckett v. State

Citations

  • 788 So. 2d 752
  • 2000 WL 33359251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that the holding in Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400, 111 S.Ct. 1364, 113 L.Ed.2d 411 (1991), eliminated the first two Batson factors
  • recognizing “inattentiveness as a race-neutral explanation for the exercise of peremptory strikes”
  • “Where a trial judge fails to elucidate such a specific explanation for each race neutral reason given, we will not remand the case for that Batson-related purpose alone.” (internal quotation mark omitted) (quoting Gary v. State, 760 So. 2d 743, 748 (Miss. 2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

142 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

197 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.