Puckett v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim for relief “must be alleged with specificity” and that a “conclusory allegation” is insufficient to survive summary dismissal under section 99-39-11(2)
• “Moreover, jurors generally may not impeach their own verdict by testifying about motives or influences affecting deliberations.” (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Lewis v. State, 725 So. 2d 183, 190-91 (Miss. 1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).