Branch v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that judgments of the lower court come to this Court clothed with a presumption of correctness, and it is the burden of the appellant to overcome that presumption
• holding that judgments of the lower court come to this Court clothed with a presumption of correctness, and it is the burden of the appellant to overcome that presumption
• appellant's duty to ensure inclusion of exhibits and Court \may only act on the record presented to it\
• “There is a presumption that the judgment of the trial court is correct, and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate some reversible error to this Court.”
• objection effective to the extent of the grounds specified, and no further
• “It is the appellant’s duty to see that all matters necessary to his appeal, such as exhibits, witnesses’ testimony, and so forth, are included in the record, and he may not complain of his own failure in that regard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).