Skip to main content
· 10/16/2003

Byrom v. State

Citations

  • 863 So. 2d 836
  • 2003 WL 22351262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no reversible error in prosecutor’s allegedly unsupported comment that defendant may have previously abused capital-murder victim when such comment was viewed in light of entire trial
  • finding sufficient evidence existed to support the instruction of the pecuniary-gain aggravator in a capital murder case where defendant planned to pay off house and car and promised to pay trigger- man money from decedent’s life-insurance proceeds
  • appellants alleging errors must present us with a complete record highlighting the alleged errors supported by citation to relevant case law
  • appellants alleging errors must present us with a complete record highlighting the alleged errors supported by citation to relevant case law
  • “failure to cite relevant authority 110 obviates the appellate court’s obligation to review such issues”
  • appellants 66 alleging errors must present us with a complete record highlighting the alleged errors supported by citation to relevant case law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.