Skip to main content
· 4/26/1990

Provenzano v. Dugger

Citations

  • 561 So. 2d 541
  • 1990 WL 55956

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Photographs must only be excluded when they demonstrate something so shocking that the risk of prejudice outweighs [their] relevancy.\
  • \Photographs must only be excluded when they demonstrate something so shocking that the risk of prejudice outweighs its relevancy.\
  • \The mere fact that Provenzano has now secured an expert who might have offered more favorable testimony is an insufficient basis for relief.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.