State v. Kirbabas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where officer’s statements following implied consent warning were found not to be false or misleading
• “[T]he officer was under no duty to give further warnings or instructions after the implied consent warning was given properly at the time of arrest.”
• “ ‘In other words, if the arresting officer witnessed the driver breaking even a relatively minor traffic law, a motion to suppress under the Fourth Amendment arguing that the stop was pretextual [would] fail.’ ”
• where officer’s statements following warning were not false or misleading

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).