Supreme Court of Georgia· 7/1/1996

Miller v. State

Citations

472 S.E.2d 74
266 Ga. 850
96 Fulton County D. Rep. 2468
1996 Ga. LEXIS 471

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that copy of drug analysis report would not be admissible as a business record because it contained the conclusion of a third party not before the court
holding that copy of drug analysis report would not be admissible as a business record because it contained the conclusion of a third party not before the court
recognizing that the proponent of hearsay evidence in the face of a Confrontation Clause objection has the burden of proving that it bears sufficient indicia of reliability to withstand scrutiny
where forensic chemist did not testify, admission into evidence of mere affidavit that reported the results of a drug analysis violated defendant’s constitutional right to confront the witnesses against him
\`Affidavits of absent witnesses cannot be admitted in evidence at criminal trials because doing so violates the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them.'\ (emphasis supplied)
“ Affidavits of absent witnesses cannot be admitted in evidence at criminal trials because doing so violates the right of defendants to confront witnesses against.them.’ ” (Emphasis supplied)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.