Klink v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• questioning whether requirement for 20-minute wait before testing constitutes an approved method
• the state complied with the requirement by showing that the defendant was in custody for over 20 minutes before being tested
• due process not violated by fact that implied consent notice did not inform driver test results could be used against him at trial
• State complied with 20-minute requirement where defendant was in custody for over 20 minutes
• “right to refuse to submit to state-administered testing is not a constitutional right, but one created by the legislature,” and due process is not violated by arresting officer’s failure to warn that results of blood-alcohol test may be used in a criminal trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).