Skip to main content

Hill v. State

Citations

  • 303 S.W.3d 863
  • 2009 WL 3821453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • seizure of cocaine, observed in plain view during traffic stop, did not implicate Fourth Amendment
  • seizure of cocaine, observed in plain view during traffic stop, did not implicate Fourth Amendment
  • “Because there was no motion for new trial addressing these alleged failures, there is only speculation that different conduct by trial counsel would have been beneficial to Hill.”
  • “[A]n officer may rely on all the facts ascertained during the course of his contact with a detainee to develop articulable facts that would justify a continued detention.”
  • “[A]n officer may rely on all the facts ascertained during the course of his contact with a detainee to develop articulable facts that would justify a continued detention.”
  • “[A]n officer may rely on all the facts ascertained during the course of his contact with a detainee to develop articulable facts that would justify a continued detention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livingston, McCOY, Meier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

76 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.