Tennessee Supreme Court· 4/29/2003

State v. Elkins

Citations

102 S.W.3d 578
2003 Tenn. LEXIS 325
2003 WL 1961798

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a victim’s testimony was sufficient to support a conviction for rape of a child, despite some inconsistencies in the victim’s testimony
holding that a child rape victim’s testimony was sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction, despite some inconsistencies in that victim’s testimony
concluding that a child victim’s testimony can be sufficient to support a conviction for child rape
holding that child rape victim’s testimony was sufficient to support conviction, -8- despite some inconsistencies in the victim’s testimony
holding that evidence of subsequent crimes are admissible if they are relevant to the issues of “identity, intent, continuing scheme or plan, or rebuttal of accident, mistake, or entrapment”
holding that child rape victim‟s testimony was sufficient to support conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barker, Drowota, Anderson, Holder, Birch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

364 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Elkins

54 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.