Powell v. LOCKHART III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that placing employee on performance improvement plan was insufficient to support disparate treatment claim, but could support retaliation claim because of lesser standard
• holding that placing employee on performance improvement plan was insufficient to support disparate treatment claim, but could support retaliation claim because of lesser standard
• holding that placing employee on performance improvement plan was insufficient to support disparate treatment claim, but could support retaliation claim because of lesser standards
• holding that placing employee on performance improvement plan was insufficient to support disparate treatment claim, but could support retaliation claim because of lesser standards
• holding that the plaintiff engaged in protected activity when she explicitly stated “that she believed that her performance review was discriminatory”
• concluding that a PIP was capable of constituting an adverse employment action for a retaliation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).