· 4/1/2010
Booth v. District of Columbia
Citations
- 701 F. Supp. 2d 73
- 2010 WL 1375309
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33194
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the absence of documentary proof indicated that the case was insufficiently meritorious to survive summary judgment
- “action' which occurs more than three or four months after protected activity is not likely to qualify for such a causal inference.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richard J. Leon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.