Tenth Circuit· 4/28/2005

Plotke v. White

Citations

405 F.3d 1092
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 7344
86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,953
95 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1025
2005 WL 984363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that conflicting and changing evidence concerning the timing and reasons for termination contributes to a showing of pretext
concluding that plaintiff established genuine issue of pretext where there was evidence that decisionmakers fabricated documents “to build a file to support the termination decision”
holding that “the conflicting evidence regarding the reasons [an employer] decided to fire [an employee] raise credibility issues for the fact finder”
holding that defendant’s “post-hoc reasons for [plaintiff's] termination ... constitute[d] evidence of pretext”
providing that new rationales not given at the time of the adverse action may show pretext
stating that the plaintiffs being the first and only woman employed at the business was relevant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, McKay, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.