Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial P.R. Wireless Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in entertaining motion for summary judgment filed 61 days after court imposed deadline because the motion presented a relatively straightforward issue
• stating that \discriminatory comments . . . made by . . . those in a position to influence the decisionmaker\ can be evidence of pretext
• stating that evidence of a company’s general atmosphere is admissible along with other evidence bearing on motive
• holding that employer’s questioning of plaintiffs “ability to balance her current work and parental responsibilities” and “to fulfill her work responsibilities should she have a second child” was sufficient evidence of discriminatory motive to avoid summary judgment
• stating that another way to generate a question as to pretext is to show discriminatory comments made by a person in a position to influence the decision maker
• stating that \discriminatory comments . . . made by . . . those in a position to influence the decisionmaker\ can be evidence of pretext

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).