Skip to main content

Pippins v. State

Citations

  • 661 N.W.2d 544
  • 2003 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 98
  • 2003 WL 21018520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding a defense attorney’s characterization of his previous representation of a prosecution witness as a conflict “does not necessarily make it so”
  • concluding a defense attorney’s characterization of his previous representation of a prosecution witness as a conflict “does not necessarily make it so”
  • holding a defense attorney’s prior representation of a victim in an unrelated civil case was not a conflict of interest
  • concluding a defense attorney’s characterization of his previous representation of a prosecution witness as a conflict “does not necessarily make it so”
  • noting one test for determining whether a conflict exists is “whether an attorney is placed in a situation conducive to divided loyalties”
  • noting one test for determining whether a conflict exists is “whether an attorney is placed in a situation conducive to divided loyalties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.