Supreme Court of Iowa· 7/21/2004
State v. Powell
Citations
- 684 N.W.2d 235
- 2004 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 212
- 2004 WL 1738690
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that an attorney is in a precarious position when continuing representation under circumstances suggesting the existence of divided loyalties
- noting that an attorney is in a precarious position when continuing representation under circumstances suggesting the existence of divided loyalties
- holding the existence of a possible conflict required remand for a determination of whether an actual conflict of interest existed, and holding a new trial would be required if an actual conflict existed
- holding defendant’s complaints about counsel’s conflict of interest warranted a full inquiry by the court such that the court abused it discretion by failing to do so and requiring a remand
- holding the existence of a possible conflict required remand for a determination of whether an actual conflict of interest existed, and holding a new trial would be required if an actual conflict existed
- affirming a case conditionally and remanding it to the district court to develop a factual record and to determine if an actual conflict exists
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Streit, Larson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. NewellSupreme Court of Iowa· 2006-02-10· cited 231×
- In Re the Marriage of SchrinerSupreme Court of Iowa· 2005-04-29· cited 110×
- State of Iowa v. Anthony Allen HoeckSupreme Court of Iowa· 2014-02-14· cited 45×
- State v. DoggettSupreme Court of Iowa· 2004-09-01· cited 44×
- In the Interest of R.E.K.F.Supreme Court of Iowa· 2005-06-10· cited 38×
- State v. SmithermanSupreme Court of Iowa· 2007-06-08· cited 32×
- Smith v. Shagnasty's Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 2004-10-06· cited 29×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa· 2009-02-13· cited 16×
- In Re REKFSupreme Court of Iowa· 2005-06-10· cited 3×
- State of Iowa v. Renee Rochelle OpperudCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2014-07-16
- State of Iowa v. Jahlee Lashawn PriceCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2014-04-16
- State Of Iowa Vs. Jeffrey D. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa· 2009-02-13
- State Of Iowa Vs. Joel Bradford SmithermanSupreme Court of Iowa· 2007-06-08
- State Of Iowa, Vs. Jerry Lee Michael NewellSupreme Court of Iowa· 2006-02-10
- State of Iowa v. Hillary Lee HunzikerCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2022-01-12
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2002-03-27· cited 1,451×
- Michael Lee Smith v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionEighth Circuit· 1991-01-15· cited 160×
- Graber v. City of AnkenySupreme Court of Iowa· 2000-09-07· cited 132×
- State v. HornessSupreme Court of Iowa· 1999-09-09· cited 100×
- Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1970-02-10· cited 100×
- United States v. Ryan Krebs (83-1098), Bernard Levine (83-1099)Sixth Circuit· 1986-06-06· cited 89×
- State v. TejedaSupreme Court of Iowa· 2004-04-07· cited 87×
- In Re the Marriage of ZabeckiSupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-06-18· cited 67×
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2001-01-02· cited 48×
- State v. KarstonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1955-10-18· cited 33×
- State v. TurnerNebraska Supreme Court· 1984-07-27· cited 24×
- Bokhoven v. KlinkerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1991-09-18· cited 20×
- Pippins v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 2003-05-07· cited 17×
- Jackson v. AugerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-02-18· cited 16×
- Matter of LuloffSupreme Court of Iowa· 1994-02-23· cited 13×
- State v. GatewoodSupreme Court of Iowa· 1970-09-02· cited 10×
- United States v. CulpM.D. Florida· 1996-07-09· cited 10×
- Hughes v. WatersSupreme Court of Iowa· 1973-02-21· cited 8×
- Cosgrove v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-04-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.