Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 761 N.W.2d 63
  • 2009 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 15
  • 2009 WL 349522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing Watson by unequivocally stating “both of Watson’s defense attorneys were members of the same firm (the public defender’s office)”
  • noting the witness “was at that time represented by . . . Montgomery’s colleague” (emphasis added)
  • noting the witness “was at that time represented by ... Montgomery’s colleague” (emphasis added)
  • noting a “possibility of a conflict [wa]s present under the facts and circumstances of th[e] case,” but the facts “weigh[ed] against finding an actual conflict of interest” while indicating the conflict was of an “inherently speculative nature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.