Skip to main content

State v. Watson

Citations

  • 620 N.W.2d 233
  • 2000 WL 1714690

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding defense counsel had actual conflict of interest where he concurrently represented prosecution witness and ordering new trial
  • holding a further inquiry is required when a conflict of interest between counsel and the defendant has been alleged
  • holding defense counsel had actual conflict of interest where he concurrently represented prosecution witness and ordering new trial
  • holding defense attorney’s simultaneous representation of the defendant and a prosecution witness in the same case was an actual conflict of interest
  • holding a district court is obligated to hold a hearing on the appropriateness of a defendant's representation when there could be a conflict of interest
  • noting that a conflict arises when defense counsel also represents an adverse witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGIVERIN, Snell, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.