Lalande v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting rationale of People v. Bullwinkle, 164 Cal. Rptr. 163, 166–67 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980), disapproved of by People v. Laiwa, 669 P.2d 1278, 1288 (Cal. 1983)
• State is not required to prove propriety of a search beyond a reasonable doubt in a motion to suppress hearing.
• State is not required to prove propriety of a search beyond a reasonable doubt in a motion to suppress hearing.
• State is not required to prove propriety of a search beyond a reasonable doubt in a motion to suppress hearing.
• ―Neither is the State required to prove the propriety of the search beyond a reasonable doubt in a hearing upon a motion to suppress evidence.‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).