Skip to main content

White v. State

Citations

  • 201 S.W.3d 233
  • 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 7057
  • 2006 WL 2310789

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting statements because they were admissible under exception to hearsay and, therefore, purpose of calling witness was not solely to introduce otherwise inadmissible hearsay
  • concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting statements because they were admissible under 37 exception to hearsay and, therefore, purpose of calling witness was not solely to introduce otherwise inadmissible hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dauphinot, Holman, Gardner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.