Court of Appeals of Maryland· 7/13/2001
Pickett v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Citations
- 775 A.2d 1218
- 365 Md. 67
- 2001 Md. LEXIS 459
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “procedural due process requires that litigants must receive notice, and an opportunity to be heard”
- explaining that “[t]he words of the rule must also be construed so as not to yield a result which is unreasonable, absurd, or illogical”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Battaglia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daniel Anthony Miller v. Prince George's County, Maryland, a Body Corporate and Politic John L. DougansFourth Circuit· 2007-01-22· cited 196×
- Waybright v. Frederick County, MDFourth Circuit· 2008-06-02· cited 140×
- Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-11-15· cited 132×
- Hamilton v. Mayor of BaltimoreD. Maryland· 2011-08-03· cited 132×
- Koshko v. HainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-01-12· cited 107×
- Beyer v. Morgan State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-06-10· cited 84×
- General Motors Corp. v. SeayCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-08-10· cited 71×
- In re Kaela C.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-08· cited 49×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-12-17· cited 48×
- Downes v. DownesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-08-15· cited 38×
- Janice M. v. Margaret K.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-05-19· cited 34×
- Steven F. LudlowWyoming Supreme Court· 2015-03-24· cited 32×
- Superior Court of California Ex Rel. Jones v. RickettsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-01· cited 17×
- Lisy Corp. v. McCormick & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-11-23· cited 16×
- Attorney Grievance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-08-12· cited 16×
- Johnson v. Dept. of HealthCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-08-24· cited 14×
- Swarey v. StephensonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-04-01· cited 13×
- G.E. Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-05-30· cited 11×
- Bartlett v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-05-19· cited 9×
- Ogundipe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-12-21· cited 9×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 3,921×
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 1,416×
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court· 1988-04-19· cited 906×
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court· 1914-06-08· cited 732×
- Greene v. LindseySupreme Court· 1982-05-17· cited 396×
- COLOMIRIS v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-03-15· cited 239×
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-01-14· cited 158×
- Mayor of Baltimore v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-07-27· cited 142×
- Barry Properties v. Fick Bros. Roofing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-03-10· cited 103×
- Pulley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-04-10· cited 99×
- Pitsenberger v. PitsenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-10-06· cited 96×
- Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc. v. Department of Employment & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-03-23· cited 83×
- In re Victor B.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-08-29· cited 80×
- Graves v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-06-04· cited 50×
- Kawamura v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-04-09· cited 47×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-08-18· cited 44×
- Ulman v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1890-07-01· cited 44×
- Marsheck v. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-04-12· cited 39×
- Long v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-11-07· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.